On 03/15/2018 07:54 AM, Alexey Potapov wrote:
> You can say: just don't use PM for such queries.Why not? For certain kinds of basic prepositional queries, such as taller, closer, larger, next-to, above, behind, is-a-part-of, is related-to -- we need a good, effective query system for those, Currently, the pattern matcher cannot do many or even most of these, but the engineering needed to make it effective is not hard. The needed changes, improvements, enhancements are straight-forward.Man, I don't understand you... Initially, I proposed to consider the possibility of performing such tweaking, but you started to argue: use space-server, use SQL, use whatever you want exect PM... I have almost agreed: OK, we will not touch PM... But now you say: it's not a hard problem. So, what was all this discussion about?..
What I had understood was to have the PM delegates to the space server space-related queries, but this would be transparent to the user, so it does require to hack the PM in that respect, maybe it's a non trivial hack, BTW.
Nil -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/24000621-b49b-d326-7da7-8c536703c5cd%40gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
