> > > >> > You can say: just don't use PM for such queries. > > > Why not? For certain kinds of basic prepositional queries, such as > taller, closer, larger, next-to, above, behind, is-a-part-of, is related-to > -- we need a good, effective query system for those, Currently, the pattern > matcher cannot do many or even most of these, but the engineering needed to > make it effective is not hard. The needed changes, improvements, > enhancements are straight-forward. >
Man, I don't understand you... Initially, I proposed to consider the possibility of performing such tweaking, but you started to argue: use space-server, use SQL, use whatever you want exect PM... I have almost agreed: OK, we will not touch PM... But now you say: it's not a hard problem. So, what was all this discussion about?.. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/opencog. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CABpRrhx%2BC5jb0n_xJSjsNHBG3bVXen3oRXssqsda85zSYRZbSg%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
