> As to Hyperon -- Ben, I skimmed through everything written on Hyperon, and it > seems (to me) like it could be "easily" implemented within the existing > AtomSpace framework. I think this would be the right direction to move in, > but I don't think that is possible until there is some sort of shared > understanding about how things work, about how things could work, about what > needs to be done. Reaching that shared understanding may require real work > and hard thinking -- there's no magic wand of sudden enlightenment -- but its > doable. And it can be done with, ahhh talking and email. I very strongly > encourage discussion. Let the sun shine in.
OK thanks for skimming the materials over... Alexey is soon (by end of August roughly, is the plan) going to produce a "first full draft" document summarizing what he thinks we need from "Atomese 2" language (which will probably get a wizzier and more appropriate name soon). Assuming I agree w/ what he suggests that will then be the time to have an in-depth discussion w you about how it might be implemented w/in the current Atomspace framework On roughly the same timescale, Senna will likely have a document summarizing his current thoughts on distribution/persistence for Hyperon, on which it also will be excellent to get your feedback .... -- Ben -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBdT_9t4AbUOG0_WvMM%2Bmo8moxFCFzcyFUxwAGfmm_t%2BbQ%40mail.gmail.com.
