Hello dear OC community,

May I drop just an observation as an independent eye? How about something 
constructive like (based on Linas' suggestions):

   1. OpenCog Genesis
   2. OpenCog Hyperon
   
and additionally:

   - OpenCog Fossils
   - OpenCog Incubator

---

Use for Fossils is obvious, and relates to Linas' excellent idea. A lot of 
people tied up a valuable time in it, and holding that work in an archive 
like this would be a great. Who knows, maybe someone has a clue how to 
revive portions of those extensions.

Genesis and Hyperon would be the first two incompatible versions in a row:

   - Genesis would be the current version (filtered at someone's wake eye); 
   it already works, it already has a user base, and it is given enough 
   attention not to just let it go like that; just package it right, and I'm 
   sure it will have enough users. Something should be made out of it, and I 
   like Linas' propositions.
   - Hyperon would be (as a product of a lot of experimentation - not to be 
   disregarded) an evolutionary step from Genesis; obviously, a considerable 
   amount of effort is invested in it; it is the second, but surely not the 
   last step in this mainstream timeline.
   - And the following versions... boy, I can't wait to see what the future 
   brings... the future is always surprisingly ingenious...
   

As a potential independent contributor, I'm particularly interested in 
Incubator as a place from which all the mainstream versions would be 
updated and refreshed by extensions worth of consideration. I like the OC 
openness, but I find the current strategy too chaotic to hold everything 
together in a right place. Incubator could solve that problem in my humble 
opinion. I wish there could be a clearer connection from Incubator to 
Genesis and Hyperon in terms of GitHub, but what we have, we have, and I'm 
grateful for it.

@Linas, do you have any thoughts on these suggestions or am I being too 
insolent?

love,
Ivan

Dana nedjelja, 18. lipnja 2023. u 04:20:50 UTC+2 korisnik Linas Vepstas 
napisao je:

> Naming and branding:
>
> So here's a proposal. Four things. Four names. Four brands:
>
> * OpenCog Classic
> * OpenCog AtomSpace
> * OpenCog Hyperon
> * OpenCog Incubator
>
> "OpenCog Classic" consists of everything abandoned and obsolete; This 
> includes PLN, URE, Attention, SpaceTime, Ghost, Relex, R2L, ROS, 
> Eva/Sophia, MOSES (but not as-moses, see below).
>
> "OpenCog AtomSpace" includes:
> -- base AtomSpace
> -- CogServer and atomspace-cog (for networking, json, websockets)
> -- atomspace-rocks (disk I/O subsystem)
> -- Proxy Nodes (for data routing, replaces attention bank)
> -- Link Grammar
>
> OpenCog Hyperon
> -- the stuff you're working on
>
> OpenCog Incubator
> -- atomspace-prolog proof-of-concept
> -- chemistry proof-of-concept
> -- agi-bio
> -- visualization
> -- as-moses
> -- vision proof-of-concept
> -- hyperon-on-top-of-atomspace proof of concept.
> -- etc.
>
> The above is the branding and website design that I would like to see. It 
> makes it clear what's what, what goes where, what's alive, what's dead. 
> what's stable, what's new.  what's broken, what's experimental. Does this 
> work for you?
>
> Two extra remarks:
>
> The hyperon-on-top-of-atomspace proof of concept. Not sure if you didn't 
> see the announcement, or you saw it and just hated it. I think putting 
> Hyperon on top of the AtomSpace is not too hard, and I think it might work 
> quite well, given that the code base is debugged and performance tuned. I 
> understand that the current devel crew does not care for such a thing. But 
> it is a viable path, and a kind of insurance policy. 
>
> Link Grammar.  I've been working to integrate Link Grammar more closely 
> with the base AtomSpace. It turns out that Link Grammar is a generic 
> structure parser. Or rather, is close to one, although some fair amount of 
> bending, welding and hammering is still required. I think it can be used to 
> process visual/video data, audio data, sensory data in general. Part of the 
> big deal is that link-grammar is now really really fast: Amir Plivatsy has 
> performance-tuned the heck out of it, it runs about 100x faster than it did 
> a decade ago. And since CPU's have also gotten faster, ... wow. So that is 
> the dataflow, or structure-flow idea. Converting any kind of streaming data 
> into a "streaming semantic graph" in real time.
>
> AS-MOSES: As a whole, it is problematic. There are a few pieces/parts I'd 
> like to rip out and breathe new life into. In particular, generic 
> "knob-turning" and deme management would be excellent stand-alone plugins 
> for the AtomSpace. I need knob-turning in order to train on video and audio 
> feeds.
>
> -- Linas
>
>
> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 6:18 PM Ben Goertzel <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> I think Linas may not care for the appellation "Classic" for the
>> version of OpenCog he's currently developing and. using .. I don't
>> really love it either but I just came up with it casually and have
>> kept using it.. it was kind of a bad joke on "coca Cola Classic"
>> really...
>>
>> Linas, how would you suggest we refer to the original, non-Hyperon
>> version of OpenCog on the opencog.org site... given that we want to
>> clearly point folks who come to the site both to a page giving
>> resources on Hyperon, and to resources on the other original/classic
>> OC version (e.g. the OC wiki, the Github repo, etc.) ...
>>
>> thanks
>> ben
>>
>> On Thu, May 18, 2023 at 12:46 PM Haley Lowy
>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello Linas!
>> >
>> > We are planning to have our web person start with a refresh of the look 
>> and feel of the OpenCog front page - drawing largely from the content that 
>> is on the foundation site currently about the theoretical underpinnings of 
>> OpenCog and its vision and goals. We’ll then have a section that features 
>> the two versions - “Classic” (which is how we’ve been referring to the 
>> original), and “Hyperon”. We will link out to the wiki, the discord, and 
>> the google group for those who want to get involved.
>> >
>> > We will then, as Ben says, add a subdomain for Hyperon - we currently 
>> don’t have a good place to collect and highlight the features and progress 
>> of this project, so this page will allow us to do that.
>> >
>> > Mario Guzman will be doing the website design and development, and we 
>> are currently building wireframes for it, which we should be able to share 
>> early next week. We are hoping to have at least a fresh landing page and 
>> some initial resources up before AGI-23.
>> >
>> > What do you have in mind, and what are your goals for a new site?
>> >
>> > I look forward to getting to coordinate with you on this, as your 
>> passion and enthusiasm for OpenCog has been so helpful to devs and 
>> researchers who want to get involved in using this system. Thank you,
>> >
>> > Haley
>> >
>> >
>> > > On May 16, 2023, at 5:40 AM, Ben Goertzel <[email protected]> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Hey!
>> > >
>> > > It seems that two parties (Haley / SNet team) and Linas are
>> > > concurrently thinking about updating the OpenCog.org site in the near
>> > > term...
>> > >
>> > > Def. this update makes sense, the site is more than a bit stale... but
>> > > let's make sure we're coordinated here...
>> > >
>> > > Linas: Our plan has been to make a subdomain hyperon.opencog.org and
>> > > use it as a main info page on Hyperon, and then insert a link on this
>> > > on the (revised) front page.  I suppose this would be compatible w/
>> > > whatever changes you're thinking of making?
>> > >
>> > > Anyway I don't want to be in the middle here communication-wise so w/
>> > > this email I am aiming to put Haley and Linas in direct communication
>> > > on this!
>> > >
>> > > thx
>> > > ben
>> > >
>> > >
>> > > --
>> > > Ben Goertzel, PhD
>> > > [email protected]
>> > >
>> > > "My humanity is a constant self-overcoming" -- Friedrich Nietzsche
>> >
>>
>>
>> -- 
>> Ben Goertzel, PhD
>> [email protected]
>>
>> "My humanity is a constant self-overcoming" -- Friedrich Nietzsche
>>
>
>
> -- 
> Patrick: Are they laughing at us?
> Sponge Bob: No, Patrick, they are laughing next to us.
>  
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"opencog" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/f4592451-f1ff-4e73-b608-7db356e83f4dn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to