> I am still hoping that you will look at and provide a response to the idea of > the hyperon-on-top-of-atomspace prototype. I think it is the easiest way for > you to get a fast & scalable Hyperon working, right now, while you wait for > the more whiz-bang thing to be developed.
I can see some short-term advantages to doing it that way, however we are currently focusing effort instead on optimizing the Rust Atomspace that's integrated w/ the MeTTa interpreter ... For speedup Greg Meredith and team are working on a system that maps MeTTa into rholang and then executes MeTTa programs using the rholang interpreter, which makes very efficient use of multithreading using Greg's rho calculus ... it's pretty cool stuff... it is indeed quite "whiz-bang" and not ready for prime-time yet but we are supposed to have an alpha by end of August.... Rholang involves a quite different method of dealing w/ concurrency than the C++ Atomspace, if you take a close look you'll probably like it... -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "opencog" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/opencog/CACYTDBfdoZWf2SRpRO4o2uLcQeMhgTPAv5mcm5YPncT_Q-JMuQ%40mail.gmail.com.
