Hey Matt, Those are good points.
For the first point, I think we can achieve that in the test plan. Maybe another section or two? Are you thinking we should use "golden NICs/servers" like OCP NICs and servers? Good logistical point on #2. Maybe a public github repo with all scripts and configs? For #3, having some sort of "stock photos/videos" that not only the lab could use, but each consortium member would be nice. thoughts? +--+ Carlos On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Matt Peterson <m...@peterson.org> wrote: > Carlos, > > I would like to see3 specific items addressed in the proposal. > > > - The first is presenting a clear "end-to-end" test scenario. While > the past two plugfests have been great for pluggables and NOS vendors, I > believe our ultimate end goal is certifying from NIC to pluggable to > chassis to NOS to L3 routing protocols and vice versa. > > > - Second is full holding strong transparency & privacy - such as all > testing scripts, procedures, and configuration files will be made publicly > available. However in the case of a failed scenario, the involved vendors > would receive remediation time (say 2 months) to re-test before results > went public. For example, we've seen a few NOS vendors not correctly > program pluggable transceivers - usually this is due to a NOS error of some > sort, doesn't seem fair for a pluggable vendor to be advertised as failing > due to a NOS vendors problem. > > > - A clause or some wording around the use of press - generally UNH-IOL > events and activities have strict rules against any participant from doing > media capture (video, photos, etc). This makes sense for a traditional > consortium that may have pre-release or pre-production equipment, however > in the case of Open Networking - many of the products are GA and existing > mass market. It seems incredibly important for us (under the OCP charter) > to continue education in the industry, presenting media is crucial to this > effort. Obviously members could opt out if requested, but generally I'd > like to see something a bit more flexible then "request UNH-IOL staff to > operate the camera, only group shots, no close-ups" norm. This could be > worded under the Public Relations section. > > --Matt > > On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Carlos Cardenas < > car...@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: > >> Howdy, >> >> As a follow up to today's call on the Open Network Consortium Testing >> section, the meeting minutes have been updated to reflect the link to the >> Membership Proposal document (link here as well: >> http://files.opencompute.org/oc/public.php?service=files&t=10b85b2c499f52fe77c3d75e89115759 >> ). >> >> For those that are interested, please review and provide feedback no >> later than 31 July. >> >> Thanks. >> >> +--+ >> Carlos >> >> _______________________________________________ >> opencompute-networking mailing list >> Unsubscribe: >> http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/options/opencompute-networking >> >> opencompute-networking@lists.opencompute.org >> http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/listinfo/opencompute-networking >> >> >
_______________________________________________ opencompute-networking mailing list Unsubscribe: http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/options/opencompute-networking opencompute-networking@lists.opencompute.org http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/listinfo/opencompute-networking
