I understand where Matt is coming from. Complete disclosure of the results to 
the public can create some serious issues for an organization.

Instead of a “Consumer’s Report” style document, it may be better to just 
create a “Catalogue of Compliant Cables.” That would permit devices that failed 
to be re-designed and re-tested for compliance and addition to the catalogue.

Cheers,
Brad

Brad Booth
Principal Engineer
Microsoft Azure Networking
brbo...@microsoft.com<mailto:brbo...@microsoft.com>


From: opencompute-networking-boun...@lists.opencompute.org 
[mailto:opencompute-networking-boun...@lists.opencompute.org] On Behalf Of 
Steve Noble
Sent: Tuesday, July 14, 2015 2:51 PM
To: Matt Peterson
Cc: opencompute-networking@lists.opencompute.org
Subject: Re: [Opencompute-networking] Open Networking Consortium Testing - 
Membership Proposal Doc

Hi Matt,

See inline


Matt Peterson<mailto:m...@peterson.org>
July 14, 2015 at 12:44 PM

Agree that results need special treatment and don't "go public by default". The 
obvious end goal of "Consumer Report" is clear, however language is needed to 
specify that exact scenario you mention. Advertising a failing item isn't doing 
a positive service for anyone, however members need to be encouraged to remedy 
problems when they arise. Not sure how to word some equal ground here, maybe a 
negative test is given a "TTL" or timeout to become compliant with all the 
parties involved, otherwise it never makes it to the public site. It may also 
seem a bit weird if all of public matrix data is 100% positive with no defects 
or failures, maybe some generic reporting is a half-way common ground "X number 
of pluggables had issues with Y and Z number of switch unique pairs" - without 
listing the member or organization by name?
I believe there should be a waiting period, for the vendor to determine what 
the failure was and if/when/how it will be fixed, but I still contend that with 
the "Consumer Reports" type concept, the failure data needs to go out.  I don't 
agree a failing item is negative for everyone, I think the knowledge is useful 
to anyone who is or might be using the device that failed.





_______________________________________________
opencompute-networking mailing list
Unsubscribe: http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/options/opencompute-networking

opencompute-networking@lists.opencompute.org
http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/listinfo/opencompute-networking

Reply via email to