Those "stock photos" could actually be in the public repo of the other scripts/configs etc...
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 2:05 PM, Carlos Cardenas <car...@cumulusnetworks.com > wrote: > Hey Matt, > > Those are good points. > > For the first point, I think we can achieve that in the test plan. Maybe > another section or two? Are you thinking we should use "golden > NICs/servers" like OCP NICs and servers? > > Good logistical point on #2. Maybe a public github repo with all scripts > and configs? > > For #3, having some sort of "stock photos/videos" that not only the lab > could use, but each consortium member would be nice. thoughts? > > > > +--+ > Carlos > > On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:16 AM, Matt Peterson <m...@peterson.org> wrote: > >> Carlos, >> >> I would like to see3 specific items addressed in the proposal. >> >> >> - The first is presenting a clear "end-to-end" test scenario. While >> the past two plugfests have been great for pluggables and NOS vendors, I >> believe our ultimate end goal is certifying from NIC to pluggable to >> chassis to NOS to L3 routing protocols and vice versa. >> >> >> - Second is full holding strong transparency & privacy - such as all >> testing scripts, procedures, and configuration files will be made publicly >> available. However in the case of a failed scenario, the involved vendors >> would receive remediation time (say 2 months) to re-test before results >> went public. For example, we've seen a few NOS vendors not correctly >> program pluggable transceivers - usually this is due to a NOS error of >> some >> sort, doesn't seem fair for a pluggable vendor to be advertised as failing >> due to a NOS vendors problem. >> >> >> - A clause or some wording around the use of press - generally >> UNH-IOL events and activities have strict rules against any participant >> from doing media capture (video, photos, etc). This makes sense for a >> traditional consortium that may have pre-release or pre-production >> equipment, however in the case of Open Networking - many of the products >> are GA and existing mass market. It seems incredibly important for us >> (under the OCP charter) to continue education in the industry, presenting >> media is crucial to this effort. Obviously members could opt out if >> requested, but generally I'd like to see something a bit more flexible >> then >> "request UNH-IOL staff to operate the camera, only group shots, no >> close-ups" norm. This could be worded under the Public Relations section. >> >> --Matt >> >> On Mon, Jul 13, 2015 at 11:44 AM, Carlos Cardenas < >> car...@cumulusnetworks.com> wrote: >> >>> Howdy, >>> >>> As a follow up to today's call on the Open Network Consortium Testing >>> section, the meeting minutes have been updated to reflect the link to the >>> Membership Proposal document (link here as well: >>> http://files.opencompute.org/oc/public.php?service=files&t=10b85b2c499f52fe77c3d75e89115759 >>> ). >>> >>> For those that are interested, please review and provide feedback no >>> later than 31 July. >>> >>> Thanks. >>> >>> +--+ >>> Carlos >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> opencompute-networking mailing list >>> Unsubscribe: >>> http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/options/opencompute-networking >>> >>> opencompute-networking@lists.opencompute.org >>> http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/listinfo/opencompute-networking >>> >>> >> >
_______________________________________________ opencompute-networking mailing list Unsubscribe: http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/options/opencompute-networking opencompute-networking@lists.opencompute.org http://lists.opencompute.org/mailman/listinfo/opencompute-networking
