Simply compiling with gcc 2.95.1 will point out a lot of problems, just look at the warnings :)
On 24-Nov-99 at 17:15, David L. Thompson ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I have not started looking too much at the Motif code, but I have > noticed that just with "X" functions that a lot of them are written > just plain wrong. I think this is going to take a lot of time to work > through all the debugging and code. I know that someone had mentioned > running Purify on the code and I have suggested we run other tools on > the code and get all the bad stuff fixed. > > If you're wondering what kinds of things I'm looking at is that > XAllocColors was called with NULL as the argument for planes. Planes > is actually an integer that should be gotten by using the > DisplayPlanes() function. As I work through the code, if there is > someone with tools that would like to run them on files, feel free to > do a few files at a time and send me the output. I'm currently trying > to work on some of the bigger files in the exec. > > David > > >I am noticing different behavior of dxui, and builder executables > >compiled with OSF/MOTIF 1.2 and OSF/MOTIF 2.1.2 on Windows. > >For example, if compiled with OSF/MOTIF 2.1.2, directory browsing > >does not work... opening a big *.net file on return dxexec.exe bombs > >and dxui often does segfault. > > > >With OSF/MOTIF 1.2 it is more or less behaves. > > > >Could there be some incompability problems with MOTIF 2.1.x? > > > >Suhaib > > > > > >**************************** > >Suhaib M. Siddiqi > >Senior Research Scientist > >Inspire Pharmaceuticals, Inc. > >4222 Emperor Blvd., Suite 470 > >Durham, NC 27703 > > > >Tel: 919-941-9777 Ext 238 > >FAX: 919-941-9797 > >http://www.inspirepharm.com > > ............................................................................. > David L. Thompson The University of Montana > mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Computer Science Department > http://www.cs.umt.edu/u/dthompsn Missoula, MT 59812 > Work Phone : (406)257-8530
