> Some time ago we almost decided to declare 4.0.10 to be OK and promote it
> to 4.1.0, but never followed through.  How about we do that, and then open
> things up wide again?  What do y'all think?
>
> Greg


After NetCDF fixes, in my opinion 4.0.10 is stable enough to be a candidate
for 4.1.0.
Though I still have problem with "Save Current, Image Magick Supported
Format" doing
a coredump on Linux. Saving as TIFF, RGB and GIFF works fine.  It is a minor
issue.

I also got a stable Exceed 6.2 (MOTIF 2.1) and Cygwin v 1.1 combination
binaries.  The dxui
was complaining of \opendx\dx/samples/macros directory not being found, with
DXROOT set to c:/opendx/dx.  The finaly hack was setting DXROOT to
C:\\opendx\\dx
fixed it.  Cygwin1.dll is smart to read path c:\\opendx\\dx/samples/macros.
I need to fix a few minor glitches then it should be ready for Release and
binaries should be comparible to DX 3.x product base.  They should work
with any X-server, but end-users having Exceed 6.2 installed would have an
added
benefit of not starting X-server first then use Opendx, instead executing
any
executable would auto-execute the Exceed X-server.

Suhaib

Reply via email to