BTW: There is no RH 7.1 planned for the near future.
At least I am not aware of it or being told by RedHat folks. Suhaib > -----Original Message----- > From: Tom G. Smith (B75826) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 8:42 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [opendx-dev] Linux GUI problems > > > Watch out if you upgrade to RH 7.0 and you also use VTK. There are > some problems compiling that I can help with if you do, but > my recommendation > is to wait for RH 7.1. > > > > > > RH 6.2 uses XF86 3.3.5 by default. There were some issues > with XF86 3.3.5, > > which were fixed in 3.3.6 > > and more fixes later in XF86 4.0.1. Maybe you consider > upgrading XF86 to > > 4.0.1, if not RH 6.2 to RH 7.0. > > > > Suhaib > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Richard Gillilan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > Sent: Thursday, November 02, 2000 10:11 AM > > > To: [email protected] > > > Subject: [opendx-dev] Linux GUI problems > > > > > > > > > I've been off the list for some time, but should be back on > > > now, although I haven't seen any messages yet. Please > > > copy your responses directly to me just in case I'm not on yet. > > > > > > I've compiled a very recent CVS version of OpenDX (a week > or two old) > > > under RedHat Linux 6.2 on an AMD Athalon machine. Works pretty > > > well, but I'm seeing some GUI problems: > > > > > > 1. Colormap editor color bar is scrambled > > > > > > 2. Multiple image windows appear to get confused and display > > > in each other's window. > > > > > > Does this sound familiar to anyone? > > > > > > > > > Richard Gillilan > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > -------------------------------------------------------------- > ---------------- > This e-mail is intended for the use of the addressee(s) only > and may contain privileged, confidential, or proprietary > information that is exempt from disclosure under law. If you > have received this message in error, please inform us > promptly by reply e-mail, then delete the e-mail and destroy > any printed copy. Thank you. > > ============================================================== > ================ >
