> 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 30 May 22 19:07 > libstdc++-libc6.1-1.so.2 -> libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so > 0 lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 31 May 22 19:07 > libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 -> libstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.10.0.so > > Note, I have the link libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 -> > libstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.10.0.so. This differs from what Tom identified > (i.e., libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 -> libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so).
Try cd /usr/lib rm -rf libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 then ln -s libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 -> libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so > Also note, I am running a very recent snapshot of the gcc suite of > compilers. The rpm packages for the dynamic libraries > libstdc++-2-libc6.1-1-2.9.0.so and ibstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.10.0.so are > libstdc++-compat-2.95.3-0.20000323 and libstdc++-2.95.3-0.20000323, > respectively. Does this seem to be ok? > It should be OK, as long as create proper symbolic links manunally. Suhaib
