Patrick Lefebvre wrote: > Hi All, > > > --- (...) > > Been off looking at some operational considerations associated > > with supporting, maintaining and updating global EHRs. > > The following types of users were considered: > > 1)CREATORS > > 2)REVIEWERS > > 3)ADMINISTRATORS > > 4)CERTIFIERS > > This idea of certification is not only good for EHRs. > > Self-proclaimed openEHR-conformant software sould also be tested by > general, > public certification tests, including EHRs & archetypes examples. > > Independent organisms should also deliver their stamps, in a scheme like: > "Veritas has controlled this software to be openEHR-compliant with the > specifications issued by... (openEHR, CEN, ISO, HL7 ?) ". > > > -- Patrick Lefebvre > "Ce que j'?cris n'engage que moi, et ce jusqu'? ma prochaine id?e." > > - > If you have any questions about using this list, > please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org > Hi All,
Certification should be identified as well. This should include information such as: station, date, time, source, results, requestor. With this information tracking can be performed so that actual/potential problems can be isolated. -Thomas Clark - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
