Hi all, Concerning certification, the model developed in Europe (through CEN and eEurope Smart Card) for electronic signature apply very well to the openEHR environment. Norbert Lipszyc ----- Message d'origine ----- De : <lakewood at copper.net> ? : "Patrick Lefebvre" <patrick.lefebvre at psl.ap-hop-paris.fr> Cc : <openehr-technical at openehr.org> Envoy? : jeudi 14 ao?t 2003 20:14 Objet : Re: certification and verification of OpenEHR
> Patrick Lefebvre wrote: > > > Hi All, > > > > > --- (...) > > > Been off looking at some operational considerations associated > > > with supporting, maintaining and updating global EHRs. > > > The following types of users were considered: > > > 1)CREATORS > > > 2)REVIEWERS > > > 3)ADMINISTRATORS > > > 4)CERTIFIERS > > > > This idea of certification is not only good for EHRs. > > > > Self-proclaimed openEHR-conformant software sould also be tested by > > general, > > public certification tests, including EHRs & archetypes examples. > > > > Independent organisms should also deliver their stamps, in a scheme like: > > "Veritas has controlled this software to be openEHR-compliant with the > > specifications issued by... (openEHR, CEN, ISO, HL7 ?) ". > > > > > > -- Patrick Lefebvre > > "Ce que j'?cris n'engage que moi, et ce jusqu'? ma prochaine id?e." > > > > - > > If you have any questions about using this list, > > please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org > > > Hi All, > > Certification should be identified as well. This should include > information such as: > station, date, time, source, results, requestor. With this information > tracking > can be performed so that actual/potential problems can be isolated. > > -Thomas Clark > > > > > > - > If you have any questions about using this list, > please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org > - If you have any questions about using this list, please send a message to d.lloyd at openehr.org
