Gerard Freriks wrote:
> Thomas, > > In a data type like DV - in my mind- only flags can be raised that > indicate the technicalities of that number. And that means "round off > error" with which it is reported. > > All other flags are at the archetype level. > Null-Flavors belong there. It is all at the semantic level, the > knowlegde level. > And not the numeric interpretation level. > > Gerard > > -- CEN/tc251 Convenor -- > > Gerard Freriks, MD > convenor CEN/tc251 WG1 > > TNO ICT > Brassersplein 2 > Delft > > T: +31 15 2857105 > M: +31 6 54792800 > > On 21-mrt-2006, at 17:34, Thomas Beale wrote: > > > Sam Heard wrote: > >> It is a flag that says the value is very uncertain - accuracy is > >> not known - how do we say this - or a quality factor makes the > >> reading very uncertain. I just want to be able to see how we > >> express when accuracy is poor but not quantifiable. > >> Sam > >> > > doesn't it mean that the value is completely useless, and that > > instead, a null-flavour flag should be set in the Element, and no > > data value be recorded at all? > > > > - thomas > > -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: larry.green.vcf Type: text/x-vcard Size: 292 bytes Desc: Card for Larry Green URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20060321/ed12f3a3/attachment.vcf>
