Thanks for this Bert; we have raised a CR - 
http://coruscant.chime.ucl.ac.uk:8200/openEHR_Collector/projects/specifications/CR/246

- thomas

Bert Verhees wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Mattias Forss schreef:
>   
>> Hi Bert,
>>  
>> Yes, I believe it should be changed. I actually made a heading change
>> for the subject setting in the GUI of the archetype editor when I saw
>> that the subject attribute of the ENTRY classes should be a
>> PARTY_RELATED (which represents the relation to the subject of data) and
>> not a PARTY_SELF (which represents the subject of data).
>>  
>> For some reason I never realized that the terminology.xml was wrong.
>>     
> I also have doubts on "Instruction state", shouldn't it be "ISM state"?
>
> Bert
>   
>>  
>> Regards,
>>  
>> Mattias
>>
>>  
>> 2007/3/16, Bert Verhees <bert.verhees at rosa.nl
>> <mailto:bert.verhees at rosa.nl>>:
>>
>>     This line is in it:
>>     <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="32" Rubric="Subject of data" />
>>
>>     when you go to grouper:
>>     <Grouper id="1" ConceptID="32" />
>>
>>     and then to groupedconcept:
>>     <GroupedConcept GrouperID="1" ChildID="0" />
>>     <GroupedConcept GrouperID="1" ChildID="3" />
>>     <GroupedConcept GrouperID="1" ChildID="6" />
>>     <GroupedConcept GrouperID="1" ChildID="7" />
>>
>>     etc....
>>
>>     which points to:
>>     <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="0" Rubric="self" />
>>     <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="3" Rubric="foetus" />
>>     <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="6" Rubric="donor" />
>>     <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="7" Rubric="maternal grandmother" />
>>     etc...
>>     --------------------------------
>>     I wonder if the above (first) line should be
>>     <Concept Language="en" ConceptID="32" Rubric="Related party
>>     relationship" />
>>
>>     because this is also in the PDF-documents: terminology.pdf page 22
>>     and in support_im.pdf, page: 59
>>
>>     Thanks,
>>     bert
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>     _______________________________________________
>>     openEHR-technical mailing list
>>     openEHR-technical at openehr.org <mailto:openEHR-technical at 
>> openehr.org>
>>     http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>>     <http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical>
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>> http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>>     
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with SUSE - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
>
> iD8DBQFF+x5ysr/NIrczD3MRAjwvAJ9tpuq6qdeJwsyD6utPvbJD8Wk74gCfZ4bd
> ji5UBvl6T9cabWqbTjWKwkg=
> =h0WC
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>
>   


-- 

* Would you vote for a politician who has not responded to An 
Inconvenient Truth <http://www.climatecrisis.net/>? *

*/Thomas Beale/*

CTO Ocean Informatics <http://www.OceanInformatics.biz>, Chair 
Architectural Review Board, /open/EHR Foundation 
<http://www.openEHR.org> Honorary Research Fellow, University College 
London <http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk>


_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical



Reply via email to