Hi Koray, At the moment we have not seen any need for multiple inheritance in archetypes. Do you have a particular use case? Note that C specialising B means that C conforms to B and to A. Nothing special needed to do that.
- thomas beale Koray Atalag wrote: > Hi, > > I have a question about the referencing of archetypes in specialization. And > also want to know if there is a limit on the number of specializations of > archetypes. > > For example: > > A is top level archetype > B is specialization of A > C has to further specialize B > and there is possibility that D also has to further specialize C and so on. > > So in theory all childs have to conform to A. But the question is in C which > archetype will be written in 'specialize' section? A or A & B ? I assume it > is currently B. But in theory, possible one in a million, a particular > specialized archetype might conform to multiple parents...In my opinion this > is perfectly possible. So what happens? > > The other question is whether ADL or other limits the number of > specializations. > > Best regards, > > Koray Atalag, MD, Ph.D. > > Freelance consultant and developer > http://koray.pathos-web.org > skype: atalagk > > > > ____________________________________________________________________________________ > Fussy? Opinionated? Impossible to please? Perfect. Join Yahoo!'s user panel > and lay it on us. http://surveylink.yahoo.com/gmrs/yahoo_panel_invite.asp?a=7 > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > > > -- please change your address book entry for me to Thomas.Beale at OceanInformatics.com *Thomas Beale* /Chief Technology Officer/ Ocean Informatics <http://www.oceaninformatics.com/> Chair Architectural Review Board, /open/EHR Foundation <http://www.openehr.org/> Honorary Research Fellow, University College London <http://www.chime.ucl.ac.uk/> * *
