Erik Sundvall wrote: > Hi! > > > > Can one share important sub-parts without sharing view on process and > structure. If so, will the information entered using the two different > archetypes be computable in a similar way for e.g. decision support > systems. > this is why we have Cluster & Structure archetypes that are routinely shared via slots in various other archetypes - it provides a high degree of re-use, just as for classes referencing other classes (assocation, aggregation) in the object paradigm .
- thomas
