Thanks for sharing those sentiments. Where there is hope there is a chance
of success.
Ed
"Dr Carola Hullin
Lucay Cossio"
<carolhullin at hotm To
ail.com> "For openEHR technical discussions"
Sent by: <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
openehr-technical cc
-bounces at openehr. "For openEHR technical discussions"
org <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
Subject
Re: Please respond by Nov.
11/06/2008 01:47 5th:Known Free/Open Source
PM EHR/EMR Deployment Count.
Please respond to
For openEHR
technical
discussions
<openehr-technica
l at openehr.org>
Dear Ed,
I got the that feeling TOO, and I wish we can get some type of working
FRAMEWORK that allow TWO AMAZING approaches to get some kind of
interoperability to JOIN forces together. I gather, at the operational
level, that is it is EXTREMELLY difficult to separate the GOOD FOR society
and business iniciatives that somehow REWARDS materially all the great
innovation created.
I am personally live everyday the prevention of great PROJECTS of EHR in
developing countries due to the lack of understanding of the balance
between, resources and people- needs---------------
Hope is what I reckon will allow us as human being to DO THE RIGHT THINGS
every day.
Cheers Carol
Melbourne Australia
--------------------------------------------------
From: "William E Hammond" <hammo...@mc.duke.edu>
Sent: Friday, November 07, 2008 5:28 AM
To: "For openEHR technical discussions" <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
Cc: "For openEHR technical discussions" <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
Subject: Re: Please respond by Nov. 5th:Known Free/Open
Source EHR/EMRDeploymentCount.
> Thanks. I agree that things are moving ahead. I wish we could remove
> some
> of the animosity (maybe I am reading it worng) towards HL7 (not from
you),
> and close the gap between the two efforts.
>
> best Regards.
>
> Ed
>
>
>
> Thomas Beale
> <thomas.beale at oce
> aninformatics.com To
> > For openEHR technical discussions
> Sent by: <openehr-technical at openehr.org>
> openehr-technical cc
> -bounces at openehr.
> org Subject
> Re: Please respond by Nov. 5th:
> Known Free/Open Source
> 11/06/2008 01:11 EHR/EMR Deployment Count.
> PM
>
>
> Please respond to
> For openEHR
> technical
> discussions
> <openehr-technica
> l at openehr.org>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> William E Hammond wrote:
>> Thomas,
>>
>> I am very impressed with these statistics. I was not aware of the
>> penetration of openEHR into that volume of use. Congratulations for a
> hugh
>> success. Can you help me identify the actual systems that are in use in
>> Australia, Netherlands and Brazil. I am specifically interested in the
> EHR
>> systems that use openEHR. We need to build on those successes.
>>
>> Thanks for sharing this information.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Ed Hammond
>>
> *Ed,
>
> I should stress that these are pure openEHR systems; systems based on
> archetypes of some kind include Systematic (SSE) in Aarhus, Denmark, and
> Obstet in Australia. Both companies have expressed serious interest in
> 'going official', and I happen to know that their architectures are
> sufficiently close to the archetype / template idea that it is feasible.
> I dont have any numbers on EHRs in these systems but I would expect in
> the hundreds of thousands, based on the catchment areas they serve.
> Although I said at the beginning that I don't think it is that useful a
> statistic, it's not a bad brut measure of uptake, so let's see if we can
> gather some better numbers, for interest's sake.
>
> One reason for success of at least our own EHR server (Ocean
> Informatics) is that its performance is good - sub-0.5 second for
> everything so far, with a typical concurrent load equivalent to about a
> 1,000 bed hospital. I don't yet have performance numbers for harder
> population queries, but mundane population queries across 10,000 -
> 250,000 EHRs are fast.
>
> This isn't the place to advertise, but I think it is reasonable to at
> least allow the community to know that real performance is indeed
> possible and feasible to implement in openEHR. If others agree, it may
> be the time to do a bit of a poll and start putting harder data on the
> 'who is using it' webpage.
>
> - thomas
>
> *
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
