On 14/01/2010 11:31, Stef Verlinden wrote: > Is anybody following the current discussion in the US about the > meaningful use citeri and/or is anybody actively involved? > > The published criteria can be found here: > http://frwebgate5.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=467405454267+0+2+0&WAISaction=retrieve > > <http://frwebgate5.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/PDFgate.cgi?WAISdocID=467405454267+0+2+0&WAISaction=retrieve> > > Is just scanned it very quickly and one thing stroke me, this is just > a pre-definition.: 'In order for an EHR technology to be eligible for > certification it must first > meet the definition of a qualified electronic health record. This term > will be defined by ONC in its upcoming interim final rule, and we > propose to use the definition of qualified electronic health record > adopted by ONC.' > > So it appears that the ONC final rule will set an important road ahead > for the coming decades. Is anybody promoting the benifits of the 13606 > standard and if not shouldn't we do that? > > > * > *
well before we do that, someone at ISO/CEN needs to think about a profile for 21090 data types (in reality HL7v3 data types tidied up and enhanced somewhat) that can work for 13606 or indeed anyone not using HL7v3 messages. See http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/stds/openEHR+to+ISO+13606-1%2C+ISO+21090+mapping for details. - thomas beale -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20100114/5e443fc1/attachment.html>
