Dear All,
I think Pablo has a very pertinent point. Theory and armchair discussions are 
good, but applicability in real life situations, and painlessly, is the need of 
the hour. 
If I were an implementor I would need a (no nonsense) 'openEHR for dummies', an 
SDK, sample code, a ready out-of-the-box installation with all the components 
in place (probably in ISO format) and a HUGE FAQ.

End of the day, what a guy need for his requirement - is what he actually need 
- nothing more, nothing less.

I am sure, somewhere in the www, many of these components do exist. Now it 
would be nice if we could get it all together on a single page.

With warm regards,

Dr D Lavanian
MBBS,MD
CEO and MD
HCIT Consultant
www.hcitconsultant.com

Certified HL7 Specialist
Member- American Medical Informatics Association
Member HIMSS
Senior Consultant and Domain Expert - Healthcare Informatics and TeleHealth

Former Vice President - Healthcare Products, Bilcare Ltd
Former Vice President - Software Division, AxSys Healthtech Ltd
Former Co-convener Sub committee on Standards , Governmental Task force for 
Telemedicine
Former Vice President - Telemedicine (Technical), Apollo Hospitals Group
Former Deputy Director Medical Services, Indian Air Force
Office: +91 20 32345045
Mobile: +91-9970921266
  ----- Original Message ----- 
  From: pablo pazos 
  To: openehr implementers2 ; openehr implementers ; openehr clinical ; openehr 
clinical ; openehr technical chime 
  Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 9:36 AM
  Subject: Why is OpenEHR adoption so slow?


  Hi Thomas,

  My opinion is the grade of adoption of a standard depend in some aspects of 
goverment agencies, in some of the industry and some of the academy.

  DICOM is a good example of an open standard heavily supported by the 
industry, that's the point of it success. Can't be OpenEHR a de-facto standard 
for EHRs? Like DICOM is for imaging. I think yes, but the progress of OpenEHR 
to solve real the problems and make it usable, is slow.

  I think OpenEHR is strong on the academy area. It has poor industry 
penetration (I mean enterprises developing tools and aplying a good part of the 
OpenEHR specification in their systems, and that these systems where used in 
some hospitals). I don't know what's the penetration of OpenEHR on goverment 
agencies. There are some open tools but there is some stillness on making 
improvements on them.


  For example, here in Latin America, almost nobody knows about OpenEHR in the 
industry area, and very very few knows about it in the academy area.

  There are some ideas that may help the difusion and adoption of OpenEHR:

  - I think that regional OpenEHR communities are needed to empower the 
adoption and spreading of the standard. In 2009 I send a message to the mailing 
lists, but I get no answer from the community (this mail is below). Now we have 
36 members from Uruguay, Argentina, Chile, Colombia, Spain, and more. They work 
on goverment agencies, big enterprises (like IBM), developers and physicians. I 
think the international OpenEHR community needs to support these regional 
communities, providing guidelines, general objectives, and following their 
work. Here in South America, only few people know about OpenEHR, that's a 
shame. People in goverment are making decissions, without knowing that are good 
and open standards out there.

  - Formal training and education in OpenEHR is needed. It's very hard to the 
newcomer to understand how to use OpenEHR, and people interested on the main 
ideas of OpenEHR may be dissapointed when they try to use it in a real-world 
software application. People in the industry must be trained, but how many 
OpenEHR trainers are out there?

  In Set-2010 I've done a hands-on OpenEHR tutorial in Argentina, and people 
(medics and TIC people) where amazed about building their archetypes and having 
a tool that generates the EHR (this is my degree project). This was done in the 
context of the "Argentine Congress of informatics and Health 2010". Now, the 
organizers want to make more time to discuss OpenEHR and its posibilities. This 
is just an example that great things can happen if someone has interest.

  Regional OpenEHR communities can build courses fucused on the regional needs, 
may be made some money to support the open tool development (*).

  - Building and supporting open tools. The current tools have no regular 
updates. We need developers to build new tools and improve the current tools. 
We can use the money of the training courses (*) to pay developers to do this 
job. If this depends only on the free time we have, tools just can die before 
they are implemented.

  - In order to help any goverment adoption of OpenEHR, the decission makers 
have some questions that today OpenEHR can't answer.
    - What is the state of the standard?
    - Is it stable?
    - Wich parts are stable?
    - Is there any return of investment study done on efective use of OpenEHR?
    - Or just, how much time and money I have to spend to effectively use 
OpenEHR in a real world application? (I have to train people to make things 
happen, not in an investigation project, but in a production project)
    - What real world products are using OpenEHR?
    - How these products are using OpenEHR? (they adopt the RM? the AOM? the 
SM?)

  There is page on "who is using OpenEHR" in the portal, but it is outdated. My 
proposal is to do regular polls on the community in order to know: who is 
working on what, and how they're using OpenEHR.

  - Formal links with "formal" SDOs are needed. I think that OMG is in tune 
with the way OpenEHR do things. They have the COAS standard, and OpenEHR RM is 
mapped to COAS. This is a good starting point to have something in common.

  I think there are very good posibilities in the OpenEHR adoption on the 
industry adn goverment areas, but we need to build improve the lines of action 
of the community to reach that.


  Just my humble opinions.
  Best regards,
  - Pablo.

  --------------------------------------------
  Hi,

  We're trying to build an spanish-speakers community about openEHR , I just 
create a google group: http://groups.google.com/group/openehr-es

  We want to translate some docs and presentations to generate enough knowledge 
to spread the word about OpenEHR, and other EHR related concepts between 
latin-american and spanish people.


  Best regards
  Pablo Pazos Gutierrez
  http://pablo.swp.googlepages.com/



------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Date: Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:19:29 +0100
  From: thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com
  To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
  Subject: Re: Articles on Healthcare, Complexity, Change, Process, IT and the 
role of openEHR etc


  Hi Derek,

  it is very simple. Not being an official standard has been a real problem for 
government agencies, obsessed with official standards. 

  - thomas beale


  On 22/10/2010 17:12, Derek Meyer wrote: 
    Tony,

    This is very impressive piece of work.  Every since I first came across 
openEHR I have intuitively felt that it is closer to the 'solution' than more 
static attempts at standardization. So why is progress so slow? I've appplied 
some lateral thinking to this, and come up with what many people on this list 
may (at best) think contrarian - but at the risk of being flamed....

    The Case for NPfIT 2.0 www.nationalhealthexecutive.com page 52-53. 

    (I'll go get my hard hat now...)

    Best wishes,

    Derek.

    On 22/10/10, "Shannon Tony (Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust)" 
<tony.shannon at nhs.net> wrote: 
      Late last year I said I would work on some material to help explain 
openEHR in the wider context of healthcare change during 2010.

      It has taken me longer that I originally planned but I've recently shared 
some articles online towards that end.
      http://frectal.com/book/

      The articles explore issues such as
      Healthcare under pressure,
      Complexity of healthcare+management+IT,
      Change and the elements within
      Aligning process improvement efforts with IT

      In the final articles I explore healthcare change going forward, the need 
for better IT and particularly why I believe openEHR has the potential to 
tackle the complexity and  diversity of healthcare..
      http://frectal.com/book/healthcare-change-the-way-forward/
      
http://frectal.com/book/healthcare-change-the-way-forward/healthcare-openehr%e2%80%99s-potential-to-handle-complexity-diversity/

      In the spirit of evolutionary change, they are up in draft form for now, 
so comments on any article are welcome..

      Hope you find it of some interest/value in explaining openEHR's place in 
the wider world.
      Please feel free to share..

      Kind regards

      Tony

      Dr Tony Shannon
      Consultant in Emergency Medicine, Leeds Teaching Hospitals
      Clinical Lead for Informatics, Leeds Teaching Hospitals
      Chair, Clinical Review Board, openEHR Foundation
      tony.shannon at nhs.net
      +44.789.988.5068

      
********************************************************************************************************************

      This message may contain confidential information. If you are not the 
intended recipient please inform the
      sender that you have received the message in error before deleting it.
      Please do not disclose, copy or distribute information in this e-mail or 
take any action in reliance on its contents:
      to do so is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.

      Thank you for your co-operation.

      NHSmail is the secure email and directory service available for all NHS 
staff in England and Scotland
      NHSmail is approved for exchanging patient data and other sensitive 
information with NHSmail and GSI recipients
      NHSmail provides an email address for your career in the NHS and can be 
accessed anywhere
      For more information and to find out how you can switch, visit 
www.connectingforhealth.nhs.uk/nhsmail

      
********************************************************************************************************************


      _______________________________________________
      openEHR-technical mailing list
      openEHR-technical at openehr.org
      http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical

_______________________________________________openEHR-technical mailing 
listopenEHR-technical at 
openehr.orghttp://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical


  -- 
          Thomas Beale
        Chief Technology Officer, Ocean Informatics

        Chair Architectural Review Board, openEHR Foundation 
        Honorary Research Fellow, University College London 
        Chartered IT Professional Fellow, BCS, British Computer Society 
        Health IT blog  




  _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing 
list openEHR-technical at openehr.org 
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical 
  _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing 
list openEHR-technical at openehr.org 
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical 


------------------------------------------------------------------------------


  _______________________________________________
  openEHR-clinical mailing list
  openEHR-clinical at openehr.org
  http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20101102/87153497/attachment.html>

Reply via email to