which is more likely to be used out of the box? intersection, or union? Union at least has everything....
Grahame On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 7:14 PM, Heath Frankel <heath.frankel at oceaninformatics.com> wrote: >> > As an ISO standard, I believe that it should be an intersection of >> all the >> > input specifications, rather than a union >> >> extension has it's own difficulties, as does union. We were aware of >> the >> berlin decision, but ISO 21090 resulted from a deliberate decision >> to do something different. Was that a right decision? Unfortunately, >> time won't tell, since the alternatives are purely hypothetical. >> > > [HKF: ] Obviously this deliberate decision was made without the parties that > were in Berlin who had come to that conclusion for a very good reason, they > had already tried that approach without success. ?So we are back to the same > position we were in 5 years ago, with another data types standard that is > unable to be used out of the box ubiquitously in healthcare information > systems. > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > -- Grahame Grieve, CTO A: Suite 8a / 17 Burgundy St, Heidelberg VIC 3083 P: + 61 3 9450 2230 M: + 61 411 867 065 F: + 61 3 92450 2299 E: grahame at kestral.com.au W: http://www.kestral.com.au
