Hi Pablo, I was about to ask you to make a proper announcement on the list. Ian beat me on this ;-)
Thanks for the excellent work and commitment to the open source community!! I will send you some specific questions later on. Cheers, Rong On 24 November 2010 16:20, pablo pazos <pazospablo at hotmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > > I have send this same email to the last 21090 discussion, and Ian ask me if > I can send it again in another thread, here it is. > Just yto give some context, this was written in response to Koray who asks > for real-world implementations, and who is studying the complexity/time of > building openEHR-based systems. > > I should clarify that the framework is the core of the system, but not the > whole system. The whole trauma application has also DICOM integration, > external MPI integration via IHE PDQ, the "generate CDA feature" (we leave > this on the framework too, but is not a part of the core), and the > calculation of quality of care indicators. > > Ian ask me if I can publish the archetypes we use, archetypes, (our own) > templates, the code, etc, are all here: > http://code.google.com/p/open-ehr-gen-framework/source/browse/#svn/trunk/open-ehr-gen > > > Cheers, > Pablo. > > -------------------- > Hi Koray, > > As an example of a "real-world implementation", we have build an EHR for > trauma care. Our project was developed in one year and four months. > The core of the development is an openEHR-based framework, wich takes > archetypes and our own templates (with GUI directives), and generate GUI, > data binding with RM structures, validation of data against archetypes > contraints, and persistence of the RM structures. BTW, this framework has > been open sourced: http://code.google.com/p/open-ehr-gen-framework/ (sorry > docs in spanish only). > > I've estimated that this particular project without the "openEHR overhead" > could be finished in 6 months. > But if I have other project like this today (same size, same complexity, > etc), I think we can finish the development en 3 months, using our > openEHR-based framework. > > So, if we have 10 projects this are the numbers: > > ??? * Without openEHR tools: total of 160 months (13.3 years) > ??? * With openEHR tools: total of 56 months (16 months for the first > development, 4 months for the rest 9 projects, that's 4,7 years!!!) > > > If we can improve the tools, these times could be improved, and the final > solutions have the advantage of separating the knowledge from the software, > and we can share and reuse archetypes between diferent projects, that's just > great! :D > > Hope this experience can help you. > ------------- > > > -- > Kind regards, > A/C Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez > LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez > Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ > Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical > >
