Hi everyone!

Attached are some screenshots of the new version of the OpenEHR-Gen Framework.

In the previous email are some key changes from the previous version of the 
framework (I thought I send it to the list but I send it only to Ian).

-- 
Kind regards,
Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez
LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez
Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos

From: [email protected]
To: ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com
Subject: RE: new openEHR-based framework
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 16:11:57 -0300








Hi Ian,

Some key points of this release:

1. We have upgraded to the last version of the underlying framework, now we use 
Grails 1.3.7.
2. Added: implementation of the Folder class. We use it to model "clinical 
record domains", like "emergency", "ambulatory", "prehospitalary", etc.
3. Improved: GUI generation, now the GUI is more compact.
4. Added: support to the "type=smallText" GUI directive for templates, that 
indicates to display a small text input for DvText nodes on the GUI generation 
(previously all the DvText nodes were displayed as a textarea/memo control).
5. Changed: now closing a clinical record is an explicit action. Before the 
records were closed when a patient was moved to another location. Now you can 
move a patient, but you have to close and sign the record explicitly.
6. Added: validation and error reporting of the occurrences constraint on 
ITEM_SINGLE nodes. This was not implemented before.
7. General code cleaning and small bugs were fixed.

Hope that helps :D

From: [email protected]
Date: Sun, 3 Apr 2011 19:57:32 +0100
Subject: Re: new openEHR-based framework
To: openehr-technical at openehr.org
CC: pazospablo at hotmail.com

Congratulations Pablo,
Would it be possible to get some headline points for this release?
Ian                                       
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110405/a99c5a46/attachment.html>

Reply via email to