On 07/04/2011 16:40, David Moner wrote: > > > So, at the end you are putting the RM version somewhere at the > identifier... :-) > > (btw, I don't know which will be the changes at R3)
no - I am just using 'r2', 'r3' as parts of a name. I.e. 'CDAr2' and 'CDAr3' may be two different names just like 'Marco' and 'Pierro', ... or like 'ICD9' and 'ICD10'. Here I am assuming that HL7 will allow anything to happen in CDAr3, including radical changes. If that is not the case, and CDAr3 is really just a clean extension of r2, then the RM we are talking about is just 'CDA', and any given archetype may or may not work with any particular minor or major release of it. - thomas * * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110407/8704148b/attachment.html>
