Great idea, Thomas!
/Rong

On 15 December 2011 10:29, Isabel Rom?n Mart?nez <isabel at trajano.us.es> 
wrote:
> Dear Thomas,
> I think it is a good idea.
> Best Regards,
> Isabel
>
> El 15/12/2011 10:01, Marcelo Rodrigues dos Santos escribi?:
>
> Dear Thomas,
>
> The creation of this list will be an excellent contribution to promote the
> harmonization process. In my opinion the alignment of these two initiatives
> is a concrete step to achieve interoperability among EHR systems.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Marcelo
>
> 2011/12/15 Seref Arikan <serefarikan at kurumsalteknoloji.com>
>
> Hi Tom,
> Yes, such a list would be good.
>
> Regards
> Seref
>
>
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 12:49 AM, Thomas Beale
> <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com> wrote:
>
>
> At the CIMI meeting last week and elsewhere, I have noticed a lot of
> interest in the ISO 13606 2012 revision, specifically in a) whether the
> openEHR and 13606 reference models can be brought together for part 1 of
> the revision and b) in finalising ADL/AOM 1.5 for providing a new
> snapshot to ISO for part 2.
>
> It seems to me that it would be useful to have a dedicated place to
> discuss this, so I would like to propose a new mailing list,
> 13606-alignment at openehr.org
>
> Does this seem like a useful idea?
>
> - thomas beale
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>


Reply via email to