On 21/12/2011 13:53, Diego Bosc? wrote: > It is not 'wrong', I'm just saying that following the same syntax for > everything would be better. We had already a discussion about this on > this same list regarding same issues on other schema. I was just > pointing them out in case they need to be changed.
despite my last comment (that the differing upper-case & mixed-case in the same schema is useful), if the community wants to change this to just camel case, that's fine. I personally would argue against it for the reasons I gave, but that's just my opinion; the opinions of people buried in XML implementations are more important. - thomas
