Just take care to use FEEDER_AUDIT for ids generated in external systems, rather than assigned within the openEHR system, including by users of apps talking directly to the openEHR system. If we don't stick to the rules, software architects won't write software that does the right thing. If we want to change the rules, that is possible as well, but it needs to be documented within the RM.
- thomas On 18/01/2011 12:13, Ian McNicoll wrote: > Hi Peter, > > Using FEEDER_AUDIT was actually discussed as part of deciding how best > to handle Placer and Filler Order numbers in lab tests etc . The > problem we have is that we also need to add these identifiers to > outgoing order /referral messages (and track those within the EHR), > and FEEDER_AUDIT was deemed unsuitable for this purpose. > > Personally I like the idea of using FEEDER_AUDIT and there is growing > recognition that we need to expose more of the RM in the models for > specific archetypes but the current specs seemed to debar the use of > FEEDER_AUDIT for outgoing identifiers. > * * -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110118/1a7ef8d7/attachment.html>
