Hi Alberto, we are working on this subject: http://code.google.com/p/open-ehr-gen-framework/ http://code.google.com/p/open-ehr-gen-framework/wiki/Optimizacion http://code.google.com/p/open-ehr-gen-framework/wiki/EstructurasDeDatos http://www.openehr.org/wiki/display/impl/Playing+with+Pablo%27s+Open+EHR-Gen+Framework
-- Kind regards, Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/ Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos Date: Fri, 3 Jun 2011 14:27:55 +0200 Subject: Dual Model EHR implementation From: [email protected] To: openehr-technical at chime.ucl.ac.uk Dear all, Within the Virgen del Rocio University Hospital we are analysing how to implement a EHR based on Dual Model Approach. When we analysed direct implementation a database based on of either OpenEHR Reference Model or ISO 13606, we have detected that it could have slow performance . Given that we are concerned about this problem, we would like to know possible strategies have been identified by implementers in order to fasten the performance of storage and query. Also the granularity level is one open issue that impacts on the performance, I would like to know if the level of granularity of the archetypes contained within the OpenEHR CKM is able to satisfy the requirements of an EHR with more than 1 million records. Kind Regards Alberto Alberto Moreno Conde GIT-Grupo de Innovaci?n Tecnol?gica Hospital Universitario Virgen del Roc?o Edif. Centro de Documentaci?n Cl?nica Avanzada Av. Manuel Siurot, s/n. C.P.: 41013 SEVILLA _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110603/836a5915/attachment.html>
