Roger,

The web site www.veriquant.com gives a few more details, but not the
low-level design information you are probably interested in. We can talk
more about this privately if you are that interested and I can let you
see what we currently have in action along with some low-level detail. There
are a lot of ways to get it wrong. EAV frameworks are not easy to build from
scratch. In my case I am overhauling our entire metadata system, going to
version 2.0, as it were, not so much to improve performance as to improve
the tooling and capacity to customize a single site and mix and merge
different standard domains, independently developed, within a single system.
One problem one can hit is how to maintain the metadata itself, let alone
what it points to! But the rewards are real.

Searching on EAV/CR will yield a number of results by the authority Prakash
Nadkarni I mentioned earlier. He does get down into some of the nitty gritty
details. I've worked with him on editing and critiquing his latest
manuscript and have differed with him at times. His manuscript and his JAMIA
articles basically relate to two EAV databases he has been involved with,
one involving clinical studies management, and the other a scientific
neurological database (SenseLab) widely used by neuroscientists worldwide.
Neither, however, involves EMR/EHR directly, and I would not simply adopt
those designs whole for EMR/EHR. But you may still find him useful. I can
put you directly in touch with him if you are interested.

Thanks,
Randy







On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 6:03 AM, Roger Erens <roger.erens at e-s-c.biz> wrote:

> On Wed, Jun 8, 2011 at 04:54, Randolph Neall <randy.neall at veriquant.com>
> wrote:
>
> ...
> >  Some EAV designs are
> > foolish and unusable. But others aren't.
>
> Thanks for your interesting explanation, Randy. Do you have some
> examples or links available that may teach us unusable/usable designs?
>
> Roger
>  _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110608/e0d922b7/attachment.html>

Reply via email to