Hi Eunice,

That is the way we think it should work and is the approach that Australia,
Sweden and Brazil are investigating. The major resource requirement is a
small editorial team which authors the archetypes and governs the review
process but we would expecty more high-quality archetypes to be developed
locally and submitted for inclusion to a shared repository as expertise
develops.

Ian
Dr Ian McNicoll
office +44 (0)1536 414 994
         +44 (0)2032 392 970
fax +44 (0)1536 516317
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
skype ianmcnicoll
ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com

Clinical Modelling Consultant, Ocean Informatics, UK
openEHR Clinical Knowledge Editor www.openehr.org/knowledge
Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
BCS Primary Health Care  www.phcsg.org



On 19 May 2011 18:22, Eunice Ab <euniceab at googlemail.com> wrote:

> Dear Ian
>
> Thank you so much for your reply.
>
> I was thinking whether there was a centrally funded team dedicated to
> developing archetypes for data standard developers. I was wondering
> whether if one was involved in a development work for clinical systems and
> notice that new archetypes are required, whether one could request for the
> archetype development free.
>
> I can see this is not the way things work....
>
> Thanks so much.
>
> Eunice
>
> On 19 May 2011 17:22, Ian McNicoll <Ian.McNicoll at 
> oceaninformatics.com>wrote:
>
>> Hi Eunice,
>>
>> There are a variety of ways in which archetype development can be
>> supported. Many of the archetypes currently on CKM have their origins in
>> work supported and funded by the English NHS. There are other people and
>> places doing development, particularly NEHTA in Australia - see
>> http://dcm.nehta.org.au/ckm/# who I understand are funding both editorial
>> and clinical review time.
>>
>> As you will see from my other reply, this is an emerging space and it is
>> difficult to answer your question directly without knowing more about what
>> you are trying to do in the NHS context. By all means email me directly if
>> you want to discuss privately. I am based in the UK and reasonably familiar
>> with the various UK standards development efforts (for better or worse!!).
>>
>> Ian
>>
>>  Dr Ian McNicoll
>> office +44 (0)1536 414 994
>>          +44 (0)2032 392 970
>> fax +44 (0)1536 516317
>> mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
>> skype ianmcnicoll
>> ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com
>>
>> Clinical Modelling Consultant, Ocean Informatics, UK
>> openEHR Clinical Knowledge Editor www.openehr.org/knowledge
>> Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
>> BCS Primary Health Care  www.phcsg.org
>>
>>
>>
>>   On 19 May 2011 16:26, Eunice Ab <euniceab at googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>   Hi All
>>>
>>> Wondering if you could help.
>>>
>>> I wanted to confirm whether one can request for archetype development for
>>> free if one does not currently exist.
>>>
>>> Are there any costs associated with this?
>>>
>>> Many thanks.
>>>
>>> Eunice
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-technical mailing list
>> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
>> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20110519/da63278a/attachment.html>

Reply via email to