On 10/09/2011 12:59, Diego Bosc? wrote: > > This kind of problems has given us a lot of problems when using ADL to > work with other models like HL7 CDA or CDISC ODM, where there isn't > any kind of rule (for example, in ADL CLASSES must be upercase and the > attributes lowercase, and in CDA this is not true)
actually there is no rule in ADL. You can use CamelCase, and it has been working for the entire lifetime of the tools. Indeed you will see it in the 13606 and 21090 schemas, which are processed by the ADL Workbench. It's just that the documents use a particular convention which happens to be the underscore convention, for better readability. My view is that any given model should stick to one or the or the convention consistently, whatever convention that may be. - thomas
