As Dipak has explained, the attribution in ISO is not available. I believe attribution is a distraction from the task - I have seen lots of slides from others used in this space and ideas transferred here and there. Let's appreciate all work and try and build on it efficiently.
Cheers Sam Sent from my phone On 10/09/2011, at 5:05 AM, Thomas Beale <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com> wrote: > On 09/09/2011 19:04, David Moner wrote: >> >> Thomas, >> >> Could you please clarify this sentence? >> >> I'm the main author of that document. As you said, it is a 45 pages >> document of which only two and a half are a summary description of ADL >> to understand the proposed archetypes. And only there we can see some >> examples of ADL structures (yes, openEHR ones) taken directly from >> EN13606-2, which is the norm referenced at the document, and not from >> the openEHR specifications. >> >> I really think that your affirmation is misleading and unfair. > > David, > > sorry - you are right, there is not 'a lot' of copied material, only p > 11 & 12. But I do find it funny that there is no mention of openEHR, > because it means that readers of the document won't realise that they > should go to openEHR to see ongoing developments in the specification > and tools (I am not saying the only development in tools of course, but > since 13606-2 is a snapshot of an openEHR spec, it would make sense to > make this clear, one would have thought). > > - thomas > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at openehr.org > http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
