I think we should strengthen arguments that Pablo proposed as promoters
of openEHR in the U.S., with scientific arguments and constructive
criticism openEHR initiative is and will be very competitive.

Regards.

Carlos.

Carlos Luis Parra Calderon

Hospital Universitario Virgen del Roc?o 

Enviado desde mi iPad

El 13/02/2012, a las 15:46, pablo pazos < pazospablo at hotmail.com
<mailto:pazospablo at hotmail.com> > escribi?:



Comparing openEHR with SNOMED is plain wrong. Yes, part of the openEHR
standard is an ontology of concepts, but this are high level concepts to
model generic information structures, in the other hand SNOMED models
fine grain concepts, with almost no structure. Certainly here is a place
to collaboration since fine grain concepts could be use onside the
generic model structures. So, here is no competition, is realy a good
collaboration ground.


Cheers,
Pablo.



Secondly, a nonsensical statement about openEHR in the book...
p.161
OpenGALEN and OpenEHR are both attempts to promote open source ontology
con-
cepts. Both of the projects have been maturing but some view these as
unnecessary
additions or alternatives to SNOMED+UMLS. However, they are available
under open
source licensing terms might make them a better alternative to SNOMED
for certain
jurisdictions.

And this, p163...

OpenEHR is a controversial approach to applying knowledge engineering
principles
to the entire EHR, including things like the user interfaces. You might
think of Open-
EHR as an ontology for EHR software design. Many health informaticists
disagree on
the usefulness of OpenEHR. Some believe that HL7 RIM, given its
comprehensive
nature, is the highest level to which formal clinical knowledge managing
needs to go.


I'm beginning to lose all respect for O'Reilly press. It's been all
downhill since the camel book.

Cheers
Michael Osborne




-- 
Michael Osborne


_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical
mailing list openEHR-technical at openehr.org
<mailto:openEHR-technical at openehr.org>
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
<http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical> 

_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical at openehr.org <mailto:openEHR-technical at openehr.org> 
http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
<http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical> 


-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120213/d26e7335/attachment.html>

Reply via email to