In ADL, the assumed value of a domain type is marked like this:
defining_code matches {
[local::
at1000, -- Standing
at1001, -- Sitting
at1002, -- Reclining
at1003, -- Lying
at1014; -- Lying with tilt to left
at1001] -- assumed value
}
but in the xml form, the assumed value is missing. The schema does not
reflect this (I know it is outdated)
<children xsi:type="C_CODE_PHRASE">
<rm_type_name>CODE_PHRASE</rm_type_name>
<occurrences>
<lower_included>true</lower_included>
<upper_included>true</upper_included>
<lower_unbounded>false</lower_unbounded>
<upper_unbounded>false</upper_unbounded>
<lower>0</lower>
<upper>1</upper>
</occurrences>
<node_id>at0009</node_id>
<terminology_id>
<value>local</value>
</terminology_id>
<code_list>at1000</code_list>
<code_list>at1001</code_list>
<code_list>at1002</code_list>
<code_list>at1003</code_list>
<code_list>at1014</code_list>
</children>
Can we reach a quick consensus on how should this be stated? Can we
use an <assumed_value> label as in all other types?
