Diego,
What tool are you using to generate your AOM XML?
The tool issue tracker may be a more appropriate place for these tooling
issues.
Heath
On 05/01/2012 10:34 PM, "Diego Bosc?" <yampeku at gmail.com> wrote:
> In ADL, the assumed value of a domain type is marked like this:
>
> defining_code matches {
> [local::
> at1000, -- Standing
> at1001, -- Sitting
> at1002, -- Reclining
> at1003, -- Lying
> at1014; -- Lying with tilt to left
> at1001] -- assumed value
> }
>
> but in the xml form, the assumed value is missing. The schema does not
> reflect this (I know it is outdated)
>
>
> <children xsi:type="C_CODE_PHRASE">
> <rm_type_name>CODE_PHRASE</rm_type_name>
> <occurrences>
> <lower_included>true</lower_included>
> <upper_included>true</upper_included>
> <lower_unbounded>false</lower_unbounded>
> <upper_unbounded>false</upper_unbounded>
> <lower>0</lower>
> <upper>1</upper>
> </occurrences>
> <node_id>at0009</node_id>
> <terminology_id>
> <value>local</value>
> </terminology_id>
> <code_list>at1000</code_list>
> <code_list>at1001</code_list>
> <code_list>at1002</code_list>
> <code_list>at1003</code_list>
> <code_list>at1014</code_list>
> </children>
>
> Can we reach a quick consensus on how should this be stated? Can we
> use an <assumed_value> label as in all other types?
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at openehr.org
> http://lists.chime.ucl.ac.uk/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120106/bbfb17b6/attachment.html>
