On 31/01/2012 13:12, Erik Sundvall wrote: > Hi! > > On Tue, Jan 31, 2012 at 13:44, Thomas Beale > <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com > <mailto:thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com>> wrote: > >> If going for an RDF-like URI based approach for "program >> directives" or "implementation_directives" then those >> serialization formats that aim for human readability (e.g. ADL >> and YAML) may want to use some kind of URI-prefixing-mechanism to >> make the directives shorter and more readable. (Similar >> approaches are used in XML (namespaces) and many >> RDF serialization formats.) > I would opt for "implementation_directives", less ambiguous. > > > In that part of the mail I was thinking of shortening serialisations > of things like... > ["http://schema.openehr.org/GUI-v0_1#view";] = > <"http://schema.openehr.org/GUI-v0_1#pass_through";> > > ...to something like... > > ["gui:view <http://schema.openehr.org/GUI-v0_1#view>"] = > <"gui:pass_through <http://schema.openehr.org/GUI-v0_1#pass_through>"> > > ...by somewhere in the file defining > > gui: > > ...to mean... > > http://schema.openehr.org/GUI-v0_1# > <http://schema.openehr.org/GUI-v0_1#pass_through> > > // Erik
Erik, which file do you mean here? Where is this alias? - thomas ** -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/private/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20120131/e84efa8c/attachment.html>
