Hi Pablo,

The EHR-CLUSTER archetype were created for some specific use cases,
where it is necessary to record demographic information within the EHR
itself, because the demographic
entity is not supported by the external Demographics service, for
technical or legal reasons e.g 3rd party carers or people reporting an
incident or perhaps laboratory contact details.

They were developed completely separately from the formal DEMOGRAPHICS
archetypes so it is not surprising that they have somewhat different
structures. I agree that it would be preferable  to align some of
these with their Demographic equivalents but I am not sure that gives
much additional benefit to implementers..

Our approach so far has been to model devices as Clusters within Entry
archetypes. I have done this both for measuring devices and for other
devices such as cannulae, catheters and drains. In any cases the
device may have a dual role.

As Heath has said, the problem with modelling the device as the
clinical author is that it is the instance of the device and not the
class device that needs to be the author e.g Nonen pulse oximetry
1123-456-769, rather than just Nonen Pulse oximeter. T

This means creating a PARTY entry for every single actual device used
in the clinical setting. There may be some added value in having a
Device registry to track the physical assets but using openEHR
Demographics to model this feels like a significant overhead.

The device may have other use-specific attributes that need to be
captured such as Entry site, location, exposed length, which
definitely need to be modelled in the EHR in a specific Composition.

So, although you could have a device as the clinical author, I think
you will end up having a lot of information that needs to be captured
in the EHR, against specific Entries. There is a case for a separate
devices asset registry but the openEHR Demographics service feels like
the wrong place for this.


Ian

On 17 June 2012 17:02, pablo pazos <pazospablo at hotmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Heather!
>
> So the partern to follow is: if you have a demographic concept that should
> be part of the clinical record, extract the internal structure to a CLUSTER
> and create an slot to that. Is that the "global solution"?
>
> BTW, there's no device modelled as AGENT on the demographic archetypes,
> shouldn't be that archetype there with an slot to the same CLUSTER?
>
> As an example, there is openEHR-DEMOGRAPHIC-ORGANISATION.organisation.v1
> and?openEHR-EHR-CLUSTER.organisation.v1, so I can use the CLUSTER inside an
> ENTRY and inside the ORGANISATION.
> The problem with those archetypes is that the ORGANIZATION doesn't reference
> to the CLUSTER, and worst, they have different internal structures, Should I
> report this on the CKM? (maybe there are other demographic archetypes with
> the same problems).
> In a couple of weeks I'll have more time, if you want I can review all the
> problematic demographic archetypes, and propose to create CLUTERs for all
> the internal structures, adding a slot to that CLUSTER on those demographic
> archetypes. What do you think?
>
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez
> LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez
> Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos
>
> ________________________________
> From: heather.leslie at oceaninformatics.com
> To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org; openehr-clinical at 
> chime.ucl.ac.uk
> Subject: RE: An ACTION or INSTRUCTION referencing an AGEN, is it possible?
> Date: Sun, 17 Jun 2012 14:59:16 +1000
>
>
> Hi Pablo,
>
>
>
> There is a CLUSTER.device archetype -
> http://www.openehr.org/knowledge/OKM.html#showarchetype_1013.1.17 - plus a
> CLUSTER.device_details archetype -
> http://www.openehr.org/knowledge/OKM.html#showarchetype_1013.1.844 - that
> might be of interest.
>
> These are modelled as openEHR EHR archetypes so as to be specified within
> the EHR itself and already used extensively within slots for many
> OBSERVATION archetypes eg OBS.blood_pressure. In addition, just as you are
> suggesting, they are intended for use within the Specific Details SLOT in
> the INSTRUCTION.request family of archetypes or in the Procedure Details
> SLOT in the ACTION.procedure archetype, as examples.
>
>
>
> Hope this is helpful
>
>
>
> Heather
>
>
>
> From: openehr-technical-bounces at lists.openehr.org
> [mailto:openehr-technical-bounces at lists.openehr.org] On Behalf Of pablo
> pazos
> Sent: Sunday, 17 June 2012 1:11 PM
> To: openehr clinical; openeh technical
> Subject: An ACTION or INSTRUCTION referencing an AGEN, is it possible?
>
>
>
> I'm correcting student papers for the openEHR course in spanish.
>
> A student has modelled oftalmologic studies for diabetic patients, with a
> demographic archetype of AGENT class to model all the devices used on the
> test.
>
>
>
> It could be very usefull to let record the device information in the ACTION
> archetype to say "this is the device we use for this test", or at the
> INSTRUCTION archetype to say "this is the device that should be used for the
> test".
>
>
>
> I'm sure some of you have solved this requirement, and I'll be very thankful
> if you can enlight me, because I don't see how the information model can
> solve this.
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
>
> --
> Kind regards,
> Ing. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez
> LinkedIn: http://uy.linkedin.com/in/pablopazosgutierrez
> Blog: http://informatica-medica.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/ppazos
>
>
> _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing
> list openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org



-- 
Dr Ian McNicoll
office +44 (0)1536 414 994
fax +44 (0)1536 516317
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
skype ianmcnicoll
ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com

Clinical Modelling Consultant,?Ocean Informatics, UK
Director openEHR Foundation ?www.openehr.org/knowledge
Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
SCIMP Working Group, NHS Scotland
BCS Primary Health Care ?www.phcsg.org

Reply via email to