On 04/15/2013 02:56 PM, Grahame Grieve wrote: > well, that's true for some parts of the record - the historical parts. > Other parts, summary parts, that's quite untrue. In most enterprise > systems, records tend to be rarely updated, or intensively updated, > and not much between
Can you give an example of parts of records which are at big risk for competitive updates? Thanks Bert.
