"big risk" - it's a combination of how likely it is, and how bad it is if they are.
Generally, current location, current medication lists, summary lists are things where contention can happen. Quite often, I've seen, a cascade of things will happen on a patient simultaineously as multiple people focus on the patient The other place where contention is a problem I've experience has been pathology reports that are not complete - in a busy lab doing 2000 reports/day, I observed editing contention 10-20x a day on average. That's pretty low, but the consequences of a clash.... bad..... Grahame On Mon, Apr 15, 2013 at 11:25 PM, Bert Verhees <bert.verhees at rosa.nl> wrote: > On 04/15/2013 02:56 PM, Grahame Grieve wrote: > >> well, that's true for some parts of the record - the historical parts. >> Other parts, summary parts, that's quite untrue. In most enterprise >> systems, records tend to be rarely updated, or intensively updated, and not >> much between >> > > > Can you give an example of parts of records which are at big risk for > competitive updates? > > Thanks > Bert. > > > ______________________________**_________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical at lists.**openehr.org<openEHR-technical at > lists.openehr.org> > http://lists.openehr.org/**mailman/listinfo/openehr-** > technical_lists.openehr.org<http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org> > -- ----- http://www.healthintersections.com.au / grahame at healthintersections.com.au/ +61 411 867 065 -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20130415/d0c05391/attachment.html>
