Sorry, what's "cases archetypes"? -- Kind regards, Eng. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez http://cabolabs.com
Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2014 09:42:34 -0600 Subject: Re: Archetype for patient demographics. From: [email protected] To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org Thanks Pablo. So, for cases archetypes need these archetypes? (Those who put in the first post). Regards 2014-03-18 16:13 GMT-06:00 pablo pazos <pazospablo at hotmail.com>: Hi, you can use plain archetypes since there's no need to create a composition to store patient demographics. I.e. there's no need to create a template to group the demographic information. You'll need a template for exaple to represent radiology report documents. Hope that helps. -- Kind regards, Eng. Pablo Pazos Guti?rrez http://cabolabs.com Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2014 14:53:13 -0600 Subject: Archetype for patient demographics. From: [email protected] To: openehr-technical at lists.openehr.org Hi. We are developing a RIS, which eo archetypes should be used to record patient demographics? We have reviewed the following archetypes in openEHR CKM of: * - Patients (Model Arquetype) * - Person name (Archetype Model) * - Person data (Structure) * - Person name (Arquetype) They should build a template with these? We should use just one? We would appreciate recommendations. regards -- _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -- _______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openehr.org/pipermail/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org/attachments/20140320/c778c0d9/attachment.html>
