So we all would probably benefit from creating some copy and paste
examples for common 3rd party attribution that can be easily
incorporated into archetypes / resources.

Ian
Dr Ian McNicoll
office +44 (0)1536 414 994
fax +44 (0)1536 516317
mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859
skype ianmcnicoll
ian.mcnicoll at oceaninformatics.com

Clinical Modelling Consultant, Ocean Informatics, UK
Director openEHR Foundation  www.openehr.org/knowledge
Honorary Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL
SCIMP Working Group, NHS Scotland
BCS Primary Health Care  www.phcsg.org


On 13 November 2014 09:24, Grahame Grieve
<grahame at healthintersections.com.au> wrote:
> you do not need to pay, but the licensing requirements are quite specific
> about what kind of attribution is required.
>
> Grahame
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:19 PM, Stefan Sauermann
> <sauermann at technikum-wien.at> wrote:
>>
>> Hello!
>> We are using LOINC in Austria for coding lab results on a national scale.
>> As far as I know nobody needs to pay anything to Regenstrief to do so.
>>
>> I am not aware of any "must mention Regenstrief" requirements, but I may
>> miss something.
>> Greetings from Vienna,
>> Stefan
>>
>> Stefan Sauermann
>>
>> Program Director
>> Biomedical Engineering Sciences (Master)
>>
>> University of Applied Sciences Technikum Wien
>> Hoechstaedtplatz 5, 1200 Vienna, Austria
>> P: +43 1 333 40 77 - 988
>> M: +43 664 6192555
>> E: stefan.sauermann at technikum-wien.at
>>
>> I: www.technikum-wien.at/mbe
>> I: www.technikum-wien.at/ibmt
>> I: www.healthy-interoperability.at
>>
>> Am 13.11.2014 10:07, schrieb Grahame Grieve:
>>
>> my advice from LOINC/regenstrief is that it does apply
>>
>> Grahame
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Nov 13, 2014 at 8:01 PM, Thomas Beale
>> <thomas.beale at oceaninformatics.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> Something that has become clear in CIMI, and will affect openEHR, 13606
>>> and most likely any archetype developer is that acknowledgements of 3rd
>>> party copyrights and trademarks need to be made. The most obvious common one
>>> is likely to be for SNOMED CT codes in archetype bindings (Stan Huff at
>>> Intermountain is still working on whether such acknowledgements are needed
>>> for LOINC codes). However, it could be for anything, e.g. rights to use a
>>> scale like Barthel or Waterlow.
>>>
>>> At the moment there is no dedicated place in the model for this
>>> particular meta-data. It could just go in 'other_details' but I suspect that
>>> we need to be more precise than that. Consider for example, the openEHR
>>> Barthel scale archetype - it currently carries this text in the 'Use'
>>> section:
>>>
>>> Note:
>>> The Maryland State Medical Society holds the copyright for the Barthel
>>> Index.  It may be used freely for non-commercial purposes with the following
>>> citation:
>>> Mahoney FI, Barthel D.  ?Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index.?
>>> Maryland State Med Journal 1965;14:56-61.  Used with permission.
>>>
>>> Permission is required to modify the Barthel Index or to use it for
>>> commercial purposes.
>>>
>>> This seems less than optimal, and is certainly not going to be reliably
>>> tool-separable from the main 'Use' content, since the word 'Note:' and the
>>> placement of this text are purely local choices.
>>>
>>> There is another issue here. The acknowledgement text actually included
>>> in the archetype needs to be minimal, and as far as legally possible not
>>> contain volatile elements that can change. Therefore, I think the general
>>> approach needs to be as is typically done with open source licences: not
>>> including the whole text, but including a reliable URL to the licence text
>>> either from the issuer (e.g. Creative Commons CC-BY page) or an agreement
>>> between the publisher and the licensor (e.g. between IHTSDO and CIMI for the
>>> use of SNOMED CT, and details of that use).
>>>
>>> I have updated the meta-data page on the wiki to indicate what I think is
>>> the requirement - see end of the main table.
>>>
>>> I am increasingly of the feeling that we need to act on this soon.
>>>
>>> - thomas
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> openEHR-clinical mailing list
>>> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
>>>
>>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> -----
>> http://www.healthintersections.com.au / grahame at healthintersections.com.au
>> / +61 411 867 065
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> openEHR-clinical mailing list
>> openEHR-clinical at lists.openehr.org
>>
>> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-clinical_lists.openehr.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> -----
> http://www.healthintersections.com.au / grahame at healthintersections.com.au 
> /
> +61 411 867 065
>
> _______________________________________________
> openEHR-technical mailing list
> openEHR-technical at lists.openehr.org
> http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org

Reply via email to