I agree with Colin proposal. 2015-07-10 2:52 GMT+02:00 Colin Sutton <[email protected]>: > Nothing is ever ‘Complete’, improvements are always possible. > ‘Final’ is not a good idea. I’ve seen different 'final’ versions of documents > and software more times than I would like. > > How about “published {date; by whom; for what purpose; attestation}”. As with > a book, you can’t change what someone is already using, it’s out in the wild. > > Colin Sutton > > > > ##################################################################################### > Scanned by MailMarshal - M86 Security's comprehensive email content security > solution. > ##################################################################################### > > ________________________________________ > IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachment to it are intended only to > be read or used by the named addressee. It is confidential and may contain > legally privileged information. No confidentiality or privilege is waived or > lost by any mistaken transmission to you. The CTC is not responsible for any > unauthorised alterations to this e-mail or attachment to it. Views expressed > in this message are those of the individual sender, and are not necessarily > the views of the CTC. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately > delete it and notify the sender. You must not disclose, copy or use any part > of this e-mail if you are not the intended recipient. > ________________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
