On 26/08/2015 16:46, Erik Sundvall wrote:
Hi!
Where can one find proposals/diagrams describing the refreshed RM
(reference model) in the new 13606 revision? Will 13606 keep using the
old data types or harmonize more with CIMI or OpenEHR?
Is there now consensus/majority regarding using ADL/AOM 2.0 for 13606?
If so, great!
When it comes to "simplifying" the RM (or perhaps moving complexity to
another meta/design-pattern layer) I think CIMI has gone further than
13606. Are there any plans of aligning 13606 with CIMI?
I would suggest that CIMI has been simiplified to the point of not being
directly usable as an RM by openEHR or 13606 - most of the needed
context information is gone in CIMI, and it doesn't distinguish any kind
of 'Entry' or clinical statement.
This was a conscious choice in the CIMI community, designed to get
buy-in from a much wider range of stakeholders than openEHR or 13606
deals with. Technically, the CIMI approach is to soft-model nearly
everything in 'reference archetypes'.
- thomas
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
