On 27-08-15 19:54, Thomas Beale wrote:
I would suggest that CIMI has been simiplified to the point of not
being directly usable as an RM by openEHR or 13606 - most of the
needed context information is gone in CIMI, and it doesn't distinguish
any kind of 'Entry' or clinical statement.
Are you saying, that the context information from the reference model is
not used?
This was a conscious choice in the CIMI community, designed to get
buy-in from a much wider range of stakeholders than openEHR or 13606
deals with. Technically, the CIMI approach is to soft-model nearly
everything in 'reference archetypes'.
and the archetypes fill in the missing reference model context parts?
If so, then this makes the two level modeling approach, of course, much
more flexible, a kind of new database approach/technique, usable for
virtual anything.
Sorry if I misunderstand you.
Bert
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
