Sorry, but I have to ask: are you doing a homework? On Friday, 28 August 2015, 王海生 <[email protected]> wrote:
> could we just add a page on openEHR website to illustrate these points > thx > > > -- > 王海生 > 15901958021 > > > 在 2015-08-28 01:54:58，"Thomas Beale" <[email protected] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','[email protected]');>> 写道： > > On 26/08/2015 16:46, Erik Sundvall wrote: > > Hi! > > Where can one find proposals/diagrams describing the refreshed RM > (reference model) in the new 13606 revision? Will 13606 keep using the > old data types or harmonize more with CIMI or OpenEHR? > > Is there now consensus/majority regarding using ADL/AOM 2.0 for 13606? If > so, great! > > When it comes to "simplifying" the RM (or perhaps moving complexity to > another meta/design-pattern layer) I think CIMI has gone further than > 13606. Are there any plans of aligning 13606 with CIMI? > > > I would suggest that CIMI has been simiplified to the point of not being > directly usable as an RM by openEHR or 13606 - most of the needed context > information is gone in CIMI, and it doesn't distinguish any kind of 'Entry' > or clinical statement. > > This was a conscious choice in the CIMI community, designed to get buy-in > from a much wider range of stakeholders than openEHR or 13606 deals with. > Technically, the CIMI approach is to soft-model nearly everything in > 'reference archetypes'. > > - thomas > > > > 夏日畅销榜大牌美妆只要1元 > <http://r.mail.163.com/r.jsp?url=http%3A%2F%2F1.163.com%2Fhd%2Foneact%2Fhdframe.do%3Fid%3D21%26from%3Dfooter_beauty&sign=817593681&_r_ignore_statId=7_13_79_48&[email protected]> >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
