Gerard,
I am not sure why you are pursuing this line of argument. The only
interesting question here is not about any 'owner', but about the
'credible maintainer'. For openly and freely licenced IP, this is all
that practically matters - the capabilities and behaviours of the
maintainer with respect to the IP. Do they provide issue reporting? Are
they responsive? Do they have transparent governance? Do they issue new
releases? Do they provide channels of communication to the community?
And so on.
- thomas
On 03/09/2015 21:00, "Gerard Freriks (privé)" wrote:
In this particular case IP is held on specifications archetypes are
making use of.
It is about ownership of IP of BOTH the Reference Model and the AOM
Gerard
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
