Thanks for your response. Based on this response and another one you gave to Silje, do you think you could give a number of owners of a standard, which you'd consider to be sufficient to make a standard not proprietary? In layman terms: how many owners should a standard have so that you would not call it proprietary?
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:11 AM, "Gerard Freriks (privé)" <gf...@luna.nl> wrote: > In the case of CEN, ISO, HL7, SNOMED all members are the owner. > > Gerard > > > > On Sep 3, 2015, at 9:00 AM, Seref Arikan < > serefari...@kurumsalteknoloji.com> wrote: > > Greetings, > Just to clarify my understanding of your understanding of the term: would > you say HL7 and Snomed CT are proprietary ? > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
