I have set up a CAMSS wiki page
<https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/stds/CAMSS+Assessment+of+openEHR>,
Silje if you can copy the relevant CAMSS boilerplate in (assessment
table etc) and make it look vaguely presentable (make child pages if you
need) then I am sure the community can get it populated quickly for you,
since it's clearly of general benefit.
- thomas
On 04/01/2016 14:24, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote:
Hi Thomas, thanks for your reply!
I don’t have any say in which assessment criteria are used,
unfortunately. I’ve seen your criteria, and agree they’re more
specifically applicable to e-health standards.
I’ll probably need a lot of help answering and justifying the CAMSS
questions, especially those regarding the governance of the
specifications. I hope it’s okay if I pose specific questions to this
list.
Regards,
*Silje*
*From:*openEHR-technical
[mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of
*Thomas Beale
*Sent:* Monday, January 4, 2016 2:57 PM
*To:* [email protected]
*Subject:* Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR
Hi Silje,
I had a look at the website - it doesn't seem as if anyone is using
CAMSS much, if we believe this page, which contains CAMSS assessments
<https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/camss/og_page/camss-assessments>,
none of which are health related. On this page
<https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/camss/og_page/list-standards>there
is a much larger list of 'recommended' standards which are all generic
(PDF, GIF and so on) - I don't know what use this is.
This page
<https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/camss/wiki/camss-05-detailed-camss-criteria>has
a long page of assessment criteria, which seem mostly reasonable to
me, but are will probably miss what I would consider the most
important criterion for value - longevity. I personally think
longevity is ultimately based on semantic scalability (lack of other
things will also kill it, like lack of community, implementations
etc). See here
<http://wolandscat.net/health-informatics/desiderata-for-successful-e-health-standards/>for
my set of criteria.
I also don't think that compatibility with other standards is
necessarily a useful criterion - it depends on whether those other
standards are in use and are themselves delivering value or just
getting in the way.
But overall the assessment tool seems OK. What I can't see is any
example of where it has been applied to an e-health standard.
- thomas
_______________________________________________
openEHR-technical mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
