I have added some links. many of the questions seem inappropriate, not applicable, or virtually impossible to answer within the health domain.
Ian Dr Ian McNicoll mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 office +44 (0)1536 414994 skype: ianmcnicoll email: i...@freshehr.com twitter: @ianmcnicoll Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. Director, HANDIHealth CIC Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL On 6 January 2016 at 08:00, Bakke, Silje Ljosland < silje.ljosland.ba...@nasjonalikt.no> wrote: > Thanks Ian! > > > > It’s good to see there are so many “yes”-es! However, we’ll need some more > info, for instance links to where the “relevant documentation of the > development and approval process of the specification is archived and > identified”. > > > > We’ll handle the spreadsheet bit. J > > > > Regards, > *Silje* > > > > *From:* openEHR-technical [mailto: > openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] *On Behalf Of *Ian McNicoll > *Sent:* Tuesday, January 05, 2016 11:37 AM > *To:* For openEHR technical discussions > > *Subject:* Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR > > > > My first go now at CAMSS wiki page > <https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/stds/CAMSS+Assessment+of+openEHR> > , > > > > There appears to be a major snafu with the CAMMS spreadsheet that > auto-sets 'not applicable' to most of the rows if 'open specification' is > set as the standard type. This makes some sense for a proprietary > specification but none whatsoever for an open specification. @Silje - you > may want to seek clarification from the CAMMS authors. > > > > Ian > > > Dr Ian McNicoll > mobile +44 (0)775 209 7859 > office +44 (0)1536 414994 > skype: ianmcnicoll > email: i...@freshehr.com > twitter: @ianmcnicoll > > Co-Chair, openEHR Foundation ian.mcnic...@openehr.org > > Director, freshEHR Clinical Informatics Ltd. > Director, HANDIHealth CIC > Hon. Senior Research Associate, CHIME, UCL > > > > On 5 January 2016 at 08:52, Bakke, Silje Ljosland < > silje.ljosland.ba...@nasjonalikt.no> wrote: > > I’ve added the CAMSS assessment table to the page. Would appreciate any > help in populating the pink cells. J > > > > Regards, > *Silje* > > > > *From:* openEHR-technical [mailto: > openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org] *On Behalf Of *Thomas Beale > *Sent:* Monday, January 04, 2016 4:08 PM > *To:* openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org > *Subject:* Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR > > > > > I have set up a CAMSS wiki page > <https://openehr.atlassian.net/wiki/display/stds/CAMSS+Assessment+of+openEHR>, > Silje if you can copy the relevant CAMSS boilerplate in (assessment table > etc) and make it look vaguely presentable (make child pages if you need) > then I am sure the community can get it populated quickly for you, since > it's clearly of general benefit. > > - thomas > > On 04/01/2016 14:24, Bakke, Silje Ljosland wrote: > > Hi Thomas, thanks for your reply! > > > > I don’t have any say in which assessment criteria are used, unfortunately. > I’ve seen your criteria, and agree they’re more specifically applicable to > e-health standards. > > > > I’ll probably need a lot of help answering and justifying the CAMSS > questions, especially those regarding the governance of the specifications. > I hope it’s okay if I pose specific questions to this list. > > > > Regards, > *Silje* > > > > *From:* openEHR-technical [ > mailto:openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org > <openehr-technical-boun...@lists.openehr.org>] *On Behalf Of *Thomas Beale > *Sent:* Monday, January 4, 2016 2:57 PM > *To:* openehr-technical@lists.openehr.org > *Subject:* Re: CAMSS assessment of openEHR > > > > > Hi Silje, > > I had a look at the website - it doesn't seem as if anyone is using CAMSS > much, if we believe this page, which contains CAMSS assessments > <https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/camss/og_page/camss-assessments>, > none of which are health related. On this page > <https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/camss/og_page/list-standards>there > is a much larger list of 'recommended' standards which are all generic > (PDF, GIF and so on) - I don't know what use this is. > > This page > <https://joinup.ec.europa.eu/community/camss/wiki/camss-05-detailed-camss-criteria>has > a long page of assessment criteria, which seem mostly reasonable to me, but > are will probably miss what I would consider the most important criterion > for value - longevity. I personally think longevity is ultimately based on > semantic scalability (lack of other things will also kill it, like lack of > community, implementations etc). See here > <http://wolandscat.net/health-informatics/desiderata-for-successful-e-health-standards/>for > my set of criteria. > > I also don't think that compatibility with other standards is necessarily > a useful criterion - it depends on whether those other standards are in use > and are themselves delivering value or just getting in the way. > > But overall the assessment tool seems OK. What I can't see is any example > of where it has been applied to an e-health standard. > > - thomas > > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org > > > > _______________________________________________ > openEHR-technical mailing list > openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org > > http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org >
_______________________________________________ openEHR-technical mailing list openEHR-technical@lists.openehr.org http://lists.openehr.org/mailman/listinfo/openehr-technical_lists.openehr.org
